Monday, January 19, 2009


Until a late-day rally on Friday, sparked by word that President-elect Obama would name Timothy Geithner as his new Treasury secretary, last week was another brutal one for the stock market, with the S&P 500 stock index hitting an 11-year low. From trading floors to kitchen tables, people are anxiously asking, “What’s next?” Historically, the markets often rally as one calendar year turns into the next, but could there really be reason to hope for a year-end rally at a time when the only precedents that seem to apply are the worst bear markets on record? “Mid-December to the end of January is known as the only free lunch on Wall Street,” says Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s Equity Research. “This year,” he says, “could be different.”
What’s ahead for stocks? Trying to predict short-term market moves, of course, is one of the quickest ways to look like an idiot. And yet there are clues to be mined.
Right now, the companies in the S&P 500 are trading at an average price-to-forward-earnings ratio of 8.4. That means investors are willing to pay $8.40 for every dollar analysts expect companies to earn in 2009. Since historically that ratio falls in the mid to high teens, the current market seems cheap by comparison, meaning stocks could be poised to rise.
But, as S&P senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt cautions, “You have to look at those companies and see if they will truly make those earnings.” If the denominator of the equation falls short, then the P/E ratio doesn’t look so hot after all. And there is reason to think projected earnings might be overstated. As of Nov. 21, an ongoing survey of stock analysts by Thomson Reuters projected next year’s earnings growth of S&P 500 companies to be 11.7%. Three weeks earlier, that projection was at 14.5%.
Yet even with more bad news on earnings, stocks worldwide still look cheap, according to an analysis headed by Robert Buckland, a Even assuming corporate profitability falls by 50% all told (so far it’s only down about 10% from last year’s peak), P/E ratios will still be in line with their 40-year average. “There’s a major space for earnings to fall,” says Buckland. “What we’re saying is a lot of that fall is already in the price.”
Of course, that doesn’t mean the market won’t keep falling, getting even cheaper. For the global market, as measured by the MSCI World Index, to hit the valuation it did in the 1981 recession, stock prices would need to fall an additional 40%.
That sort of analysis, however, hardly accounts for all the factors that move the markets. One of the main forces behind the mass sell-offs in October, for instance, was hedge funds being forced to sell their holdings as they deleveraged, scrambling to raise cash to pay investors who wanted their money back. Those sorts of mechanical forces will surely play a role in the market going forward, as well.
The good news about hedge fund selling is that many funds raised substantial cash in the past month, and should be able to meet redemptions with money they already have on hand — at least in the short term. But the mutual fund industry, where fleeing investors don’t have to give 45-day notice as they do at most hedge funds, may be a different story. According to an analysis by TrimTabs Investment Research, in the last bear market, at the time of the bursting of the tech bubble, 4.3% of dollars in U.S. stock funds were withdrawn. So far in this cycle, which is inarguably more severe, only 3.5% of such assets have fled. “To me, this says there’s more mutual fund selling to go,” says TrimTabs president and COO Conrad Gann.
For the market, that could pose a double whammy. As mutual funds have been forced to sell long-held positions to meet redemptions this year, they’ve generated capital gains — which must be passed along to investors. We might therefore also see a round of year-end selling of mutual fund shares by investors looking to offset gains and avoid paying taxes by locking in losses. “Tax-loss selling is a very powerful force,” says Joe Battipaglia, market strategist for the private client group at Stifel Nicolaus. “The market is down 50% from a year ago — those are sizeable losses.”
There are, of course, a host of other issues that might swing the market one way or another, from the fate of Citigroup and the auto industry bailout, to the Federal Reserve’s mid-December meeting, where another cut in interests may be in the offing. Add it all up and the short-term view is — surprise — more uncertainty. “Sometimes we have year-end rallies, and we definitely could use one. We could all use a break from this bear market,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. “But just because we need it doesn’t mean we’re going to get it.”

What the World Wants Today

For all the progress and momentum of the local food movement, people are still stuck in the 1970s when the solution to the world’s problems seemed to be a bottle of Coca-Cola. “I’d like to buy the world a Coke and keep it company,” went the jingle in the 1971 hit television commercial. Young smiling people from around the world sang the song on a hilltop in Italy, each holding a bottle of Coke. “It’s the real thing,” they crooned, “Coke is what the world wants today.”
And it still is, it seems. At a food conference held last week at Columbia University, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg talked about the administration’s efforts to bring healthier food to New Yorkers. He mentioned the ban on cigarette smoking in restaurants, the elimination on trans fats in food and the administration’s new food battles: reducing salt in packaged foods and listing calories in food menus. It was music to the ears of the thousand food advocates and locavores assembled in Columbia’s grand Alfred Lerner Hall.
But the music suddenly stopped. When talking about the need for greater access to good-quality food in low-income neighborhoods, Mayor Bloomberg noted that people couldn’t get fresh fruits and vegetables, or low-fat milk, or he said “diet soda.” Corner bodegas, he said, only had regular soda.
The crowd was aghast. Mayor Bloomberg — introduced by Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer as a man who “gets it” when it comes to food and the environment — didn’t get it all.
Didn’t he know, the startled audience thought, that soda — whether diet or not — had high fructose corn syrup, which not only is unhealthy but soaks up gallons of fossil fuels to produce? Didn’t he know that?
Apparently not. Most people don’t.
While Mayor Bloomberg was delivering his remarks, rocker Gene Simmons of KISS was downtown on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange promoting “Gene Simmons Family Jewels”, a reality television series about the musician’s family. Simmons took the opportunity while on the air with Fox Business News anchor Alexis Glick to make a pitch for the U.S. capital markets.
“Invest in America,” he exhorted viewers, as stock market prices were falling to new depths. “I’m buying.”
The American economy, he said, just needed to go on a diet. Stop spending “stupid money” on things like cigarettes, he told the viewers, and take the “throw-away money” and invest it in the market. If you like Coke, buy Coke, he said. If you like hamburgers, buy MacDonald’s.
The famous guitarist was charming and gracious in a Gene Simmons kind of way. “Forget about me,” he said. “What’s around me is what makes America great.”
Yet for all his patriotism, Mr. Simmons like Mayor Bloomberg didn’t get it. In the same breath that he recommended buying Coke, he noted that the nation needed to “get out of Mideast oil.”
Mr. Simmons didn’t see that Coke is dependent on Mideast oil for the manufacture of fertilizers and pesticides needed to grow mass quantities of industrial corn. He didn’t see that connection or understand the havoc that industrial agriculture wreaks on the environment.
Every bushel of industrial corn requires the equivalent of between a quarter and a third of a gallon of oil to grow it, or around 50 gallons of oil per acre of corn, according to Michael Pollan’s book “Omnivore’s Dilemma.”
For all their good intentions, Mr. Simmons and Mayor Bloomberg are missing the point. What the world needs to do is wean itself off Coke and other sodas altogether. They’re bad for people’s health, the environment and long-term even the economy. What the world wants today hopefully won’t be anything it will want to touch tomorrow.

http://mcorreia.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/what-the-world-wants-today/

Big advertising companies cutting thousands of jobs

Two of the world’s largest advertising companies, Omnicom Group Inc and Interpublic Group, are cutting thousands of jobs in the face of an advertising downturn that is shaping up as the worst since the Internet bubble burst in 2001.
Battling an industrywide slump caused by a pullback in spending in the all-important automotive, financial services and retail categories, Omnicom Group Inc will cut 4 percent to 5 percent of its worldwide staff by the end of this week, according to a source close to the situation.
The cuts amount to 2,800 to 3,500 positions out of a worldwide headcount of about 70,000.
Sources close to Omnicom rival Interpublic Group say its agencies are also considering targeted cuts, following promises by Chief Executive Michael Roth to manage the business “conservatively” in the face of the downturn.
Roth told investors in October that the parent company of DraftFCB, McCann Erickson, Lowe and dozens of other agencies would remain “extremely focused on controlling costs and managing margins” as the financial crisis weighed on spending.
For now, sources estimate that job losses at the Interpublic agencies will amount to less than 5 percent of the worldwide staff, meaning no more than 2,000 jobs.
At Omnicom, the job cuts began last week and will be completed by the end of the week, according to a source.
In a statement, Omnicom said: “Given current economic conditions, our companies have reviewed their staffing levels as they relate to their current business requirements. Some, but not all, will have to make adjustments.”
Omnicom, which has posted some of the industry’s best results in recent years, is home to high caliber agencies BBDO Worldwide, PHD and DDB Worldwide.
Their client list includes premier companies such as Procter & Gamble Co, AT&T Inc, McDonald’s Corp, Apple Inc, Adidas AG, and Visa Inc.
But spending cuts are coming from all marketing areas as corporations try to keep costs low. Chrysler, the automaker which has said it needs a cash infusion to survive, is also a top client of Omnicom’s BBDO.
Overall, ad industry experts expect U.S. ad spending to decline by about 5 percent next year, the biggest drop in eight years, and said that the marketing industry may not recover before 2010.
Shares of Omnicom closed unchanged at $27.60 on the New York Stock Exchange. Shares of Interpublic fell 13 cents, or 3.07 percent, to $4.10.

http://buysellsignals.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/big-advertising-companies-cutting-thousands-of-jobs/

……Humpty Dumpty Fell on Wall Street


Humpty Dumpty……the Historical Accounting of Obese Economics…
Nursery Rhyme & History….(forensics by windiepink)
Humpty Dumpty sat on the WallHumpty Dumpty had a big FallAll the Kings Horsesand all the Kings MenCould’t put Humpty Dumpty backwards together again…..
The imagery of Humpty Dumpty was a colloquial term used in fifteenth century England describing someone who was obese. This has given rise to various, but inaccurate, theories surrounding the identity of Humpty Dumpty….. Iwill do my best to set the record straight once and for all…. as given to me by the Buttonwood Tree… and passed on by tree to tree to tree to find its way to me here in New Westminster in British Columbia Canada… Do trees like to talk or what..????
The History and Origins of Humpty Dumpty…… Obese Economics… commonly referred to as Greed
Humpty Dumpty is in fact the swindling traders and speculators of obese economics founded upon the famous Wall Street which runs through lower Manhattan and is globally known as the Manhattan Financial District. Home of the New York Stock Exchange or as some like to callit…. “The Big Board”. and as of Sept 15 2008… History knows it as…”The Humpty Dumpty Board”… that fell on Wall Street…
In the late 18th century, there was a buttonwood tree at the foot of Wall Street under which traders and speculators would gather to trade informally. In 1792, the traders formalized their association with the Buttonwood Agreement. This was the origin of the Wall Street, thehistoric site now known to offer numerous variate in toxic investments by financial institutions and corporations, and as such, has become a symbol of commerce and the American economy.
OR…..Surely you would not dare to believe that Humpty Dumpty was some other nonsense…. untruths spread by historians who believethat Humpty Dumpty was in fact a large cannon used during the English Civil War ( 1642 - 1649) in the Siege of Colchester (13 Jun 1648 - 27 Aug 1648). Perpetuating such a silly notion that Colchester was strongly fortified by the Royalists and was laid to siege by the Parliamentarians (Roundheads). We all know that in 1648 the town ofColchester was a walled town with a castle and several churches and was well protected by the fortified city wall. I mean….just because there was a huge Canon called Humpty Dumpty standing by St Mary’s Church immediately adjacent the city wall .. does not mean it istrue.
So what if the historical events detailing the siege of Colchester are well documented and references to the cannon ( Humpty Dumpty) are as follows……..….June 15th 1648 - St Mary’s Church is fortified and a large cannon is placed on the roof which was fired by ‘One-Eyed Jack Thompson’….that sounds so made up…!!!
….July 14th / July 15th 1648 - The Royalist fort within the walls at St Mary’s church is blown to pieces and their main cannon battery (Humpty Dumpty) is destroyed…. OK… well maybe there was a Canon called Humpty Dumpty… but just maybe..???…August 28th 1648 - The Royalists lay down their arms, open the gates of Colchester and surrender to the Parliamentarians…..Ok.. sothen what happened..???A shot from a Parliamentary cannon succeeded in damaging the wall beneath Humpty Dumpty which caused the cannon to tumble to the ground. The Royalists, or Cavaliers, ‘all the King’s men’ attempted to raiseHumpty Dumpty on to another part of the wall. However, because the cannon , or Humpty Dumpty, was so heavy ‘ All the King’s horses and all the King’s men couldn’t put Humpty together again!’ This had a drastic consequence for the Royalists as the strategically importanttown of Colchester fell to the Parliamentarians after a siege lasting eleven weeks. Earliest traceable publication 1810.
Thank you for reading, … may you find the Wisdom You Seek

Full Moon in Taurus Nov. 13, 2008

Tomorrow’s full Moon at 21 degrees of Taurus makes a T-square to the Sun/Mercury/Mars lineup in Scorpio and the Aquarius stellium of Neptune, North Node, and Chiron in the sky. Expect further dissolution of hard assets.
I pointed this out back in September, but it bears repeating: This full Moon activates the inception chart of the New York Stock Exchange, so be ready for further damage in the equities market.
Indeed, the Dow Jones industrial average closed down 410 points, to the 8,283 level on Nov. 12, after Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced that under the $700 billion “mother of all bailouts,” the government will not purchase troubled assets after all.
Hey, remember how the Troubled Asset Relief Program, also known as TARP, was announced during a Mercury retrograde? No surprise that it’s being rejiggered, no doubt for the best.
On a personal level, this full Moon, which occurs at 1:19 a.m. Eastern time, could bring to fruition some new creative plan that you’ve been working on or the resolution of a real estate or business matter.
Mars in the last degrees of Scorpio is past an opposition to the full Moon, but it’s still within orb in my book. Upsetting information about debt or declining asset values could be revealed tonight.
You may not like what you see when you open up your portfolio statement for the month of October. Another scenario is that the local township has raised taxes on your house, even though it’s falling in value.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Halloween is Here! Five Tips to Make Sure You’re Not “Trick-or-Treating” with your Finances


With all the news about the current state of the economy, many people are going into “survival mode,” reducing their spending to make their money last longer. It seems that most of us are carefully watching every penny, due to the unpredictability of the current economic situation.

While it’s always important to keep a close watch on your finances, it’s also important to keep morale high by not cutting all the fun out of our budgets. With Halloween upon us, it’s a good time to think about ways we can maintain our traditions, without breaking the bank.
Here are a few tips to enjoy the season on a budget:

5 Tips To Help Your Bank Account Survive the Holiday Season in Uncertain Economic Times


At this time of economic uncertainty, probably the last thing many of us want to think about is the approach of the season when we tend to spend more money than any other time of year. With the way the unemployment rate, stock market and other sources of income and investment have been headed, many of us are struggling to make ends meet with our regular expenses, without adding in all the special extras that accompany the holiday season.
Between travel expenditures to see family, gifts for loved ones, large family dinners and elaborate decorations, the additional expenditures we’ll encounter over the next few weeks are enough to throw our budgets out of control. But who wants to think about monetary difficulties at this festive time of year? With the stress so many Americans are facing, the holiday season may be just what we need to restore spirits and rejuvenate ourselves for the approaching new year. So how do we find a balance?